|
| | | Services Director
|
| This user has been banned from our site permanently. No need to worry about it anymore. If you receive any further pages from this person, let us know.-CM
-CM |
| |
| | | 
Administrator
|
| Just to make it clear.. your message didn't result in the ban.
I had banned her earlier this evening for other reasons but this certainly backs up the ban. |
| |
| | | | I applaud this, and there's no need for further explanations, since said chatter repeatedly broke rule no.2 of the Pork which says "Restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying The-Pork.com.
These were not fights in the heat of an argument - such things do happen to all of us. But in that case, those were planned irritations. In her most recent thread she admitted that she starts fights in order to deliberately "pull strings" on people - and paying members shouldn't have to put up with such crap - since a simple ignore doesn't help in such cases of massive irritation in just about any discussion topic.
She will undoubtedly return under a new nick. But until then, in the meantime we can enjoy a relaxed atmosphere.
|
| |
| | | | annie ~smiles
I can imagine several others have pondered renewal or cancelling too ... but for the opposite reason.
And the freedom you cite, it is finite. It ends right at my doorstep.
|
| |
| | | | I don't think it's proper to explain the reason why someone was banned. Perchance say someone got banned for being a known child molester and leading kids to give up information, the Pork states "So and so was banned." Not "so and so was banned because of such."
It's a business. Knowing what the line is dangerous, because if you dance it too much, they might move it. It's better practice not to dance the line and just know your own limits. |
| |
| | |
Administrator
|
| Yup.. I'm not going to give a long drawn out explanation why..
We don't ban on the spot... we give you plenty of warnings if you're dancing on the line..
|
| |
| | | | bandwidth costs money
from the sheer magnitude of her insipid posts she was eating it up like piggies in a blanket at a fat chick convention |
| |
| | | | i shall now morn the loss of one of my favorite insults. we no longer can call someone "crazy as saiya" and expect them to understand and feel mocked by it. it shall be missed.
"Honestly... people who wouldn't be caught dead in a bad movie or ill-fitting clothes will go months or years with the wrong person! It's all baffling!"
Igor Oldman Dork Tower
"Don't blame me because I speak with infallible logic, stupid human"
Foamy |
| |
| | | | It is sad that she was Banned. Yes she caused harm to others. and Yes she was annoying in her own little way. But atleast we knew the name.
Ahh well. she always finds a way of poping up from no where.
She also needs help rather than being made the victim. She enjoys that part o well.
As for the freedom of speech. I don't see how banning her is an infrigement. Remember you can spout off all you want about a great many things. However infringe apon another's freedom then that's not okay.
Sorry it's how I feel. |
| |
| | | | * great.....there goes the foil.....for my internet-chat reality program.........*
|
| |
|
|